Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding changes. Others, however, think that changes is always a good thing.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of making changes in our life and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas many people are keenly willing to pursue their routine practices days and days, others are of the opinion that changes in humans’ life are inevitable. In my mind, spending our entire life to do the same things is a nightmare and changes bring with itself benefits in terms of psychology as well as physiology.
Obviously, the chance to escape doing our work in the same way for years leads to enormous psychological merits. One of its prominent advantages is mobility. Following a regular routine in our life, eventually leads to appear different levels of depression, according to psychologists’ findings. Hence, exploring noble ways to deal with our occupations or performing ever-unexperienced things pave the way to climb our excitement and self-satisfactory.
Moreover, physiological benefits of welcoming to changes should be taken into consideration. If people carry out their routine practices differently, new connections will be established in their brains, as scientists’ experiments. These new connections will prevent various such age-related diseases as Parkinson’s in not distant future. Building up more sophisticated structures in brains has the ability to postpone deterioration of brain as well.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t lose sight of opponents’ view. Loads of individuals prefer to maintain their stability. For example, if someone could acquire a proper job and earn sufficient income, it makes sense not to alter his or her profession. It is likely that adults experience difficulties in their life and may cause to bankruptcy regarding in family life due to make changes in their stable everyday life.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I am inclined to support the idea that changes are necessary as we are humans. By the way, changes end up with evolution and provide mankind with the opportunity to survive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... postpone deterioration of brain as well On the other hand we shouldnt lose sight...
^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...of brain as well On the other hand we shouldnt lose sight of opponents view Loads of i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, whereas, for example, as well as, by the way, to sum up, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23734177215 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07173195014 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617088607595 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 316.0 20.2975951904 1557% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1655.0 106.682146367 1551% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 316.0 20.7667163134 1522% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 138.0 7.06120827912 1954% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208671506526 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208671506526 0.084324248473 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105028631522 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552505817906 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 161.3 13.0946893788 1232% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -257.72 50.2224549098 -513% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 127.7 11.3001002004 1130% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.59 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.06 8.58950901804 280% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 128.4 10.1190380762 1269% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 128.0 10.7795591182 1187% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.