Advertisement influences people to a great extent. Many people think that adverts showcasing products that attracts children has a lot of downside and shall be banned. I agree with this statement, an advert made to target young people are usually of the unhealthy food products and non essential gadgets, which has a harmful effect on them. So, the best solution is to ban them. However, products focusing on brain development and life skills can be encouraged.
The frequency of ads on television and social media have increased greatly and their main targets are the young minds. As these children are easily influenced by the fancy advertisement, it gets really difficult for the parent to have a control on them. Most of the adverts are focused on packed food items like Cheetos, Lays, Aerated drinks and many more, such food products are very unhealthy and has long term bad effects. Such items have zero nutritional value and has only sugar and fat content, that contributes to overweight issues in children. For instance, an advertisement shows a product of Kinder Joy, a chocolate dip and stick has a surprise toy inside it, so such advertisement attracts the child to buy that product with no nutritional value.
The best solution to avoid such non essential buying by the children is to ban these adverts. By banning, children will have no idea of the unhealthy products available in the market and will not demand for them. In middle east countries many advertise showing such unhealthy products that attracts children has been banned and it has resulted in a positive way. Also, one can encourage the advertisements showing good products rather than the unhealthy one. For example, ads of books or intellectual toys can be promoted that helps a child to develop a skills.
In conclusion, it is better to ban the ads that promotes products that are harmful or non essential for children. However, adverts that promotes items that helps in the overall development of child's intellectual ability and communication skills can have a positive influence on children and those should be encouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun downside seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of downsides'.
Suggestion: a lot of downsides
...ing products that attracts children has a lot of downside and shall be banned. I agree with this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...roducts are very unhealthy and has long term bad effects. Such items have zero nutri...
^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'sugared'.
Suggestion: sugared
...ave zero nutritional value and has only sugar and fat content, that contributes to ov...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so such advertisement attracts the child to buy that product with no nutritional ...
^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ren has been banned and it has resulted in a positive way. Also, one can encourage the advertisem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a skill' or simply 'skills'?
Suggestion: a skill; skills
... promoted that helps a child to develop a skills. In conclusion, it is better to ban...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0659025788 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78496762923 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507163323782 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8154111966 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238053416384 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888366079943 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601434639103 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154680815869 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511878985156 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.