Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary to universities, too much spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that education can be considered as the most factor for development of both individuals and societies. However, it is argued point that primary and other education levels too focus on abstract and theoretical knowledge whilst practical skills often ignored by the majority of curriculum and teachers. I partly agree with this proposition and there are also some details, I’d like to clarify in forthcoming paragraphs.
It is reasonable to believe that students spend a most amount of their time on learning facts at schools and universities. First of all, accepting education is to pass all kind of examinations and obtain qualifactions, in many cases, most student are spending a considerable of time for memorising these theories instead of finding way of applying them in real world. In addition, numerous educationlists believe that universities and colleges have no responsibility to educate students about practical skills, as those knowledges can be obtained in the future workplaces, therefore it is idea believed that it is necessary to spend time to learn these skills in advance.
On the other hand, it is also worth mention that many educational instituons provide students enough time to improve their practical skills. Many tutors distribute a variety of individual homework and team work projects to pupils, which makes a great contribute to the development of their practical abilities regarding technical and other fields. For instance, some projects could require a real case for law student to analyze or they are wanted to create a software application for IT students to develop about tech issues.
In conclusion, it is unquestionable that both schools and universities have a tendency to concentrate on facts and theories instead of practical knowledge but I believed that most students are able to develop their practical skills by spending time on coursework.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to focus'?
Suggestion: to focus
...that primary and other education levels too focus on abstract and theoretical knowledge w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, first of all, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37209302326 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06740067828 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548172757475 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8420568869 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.7 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.4 7.06120827912 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153306074602 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630562881867 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403074412263 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885651045076 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238499170364 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.