Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree?

In education, practical learning plays an important role, with out practical experience the theoretical facts are wothless. Major schools and universities mainly concentrate only on saying facts but they are not able to implement. I completely agree that people should learn by doing experimentally not on sitting and listening.
Students would learn things by doing some experiments in classes. Then the children would get more interest towards study. Sitting in a class and teaching the facts to them does not understand anything. They get bored and they stop concentrating. At their small ages they seems to learn alot. And it will be in their mind forever. So, placing some type of laboratories in school attracts the kids towards their school. For instance, My sister's daughter, she is studying third class. I see an intresting topic on their science book. How the stratch is formed? She is not able to understand while just teaching. Once I started doing experiment then will able to understand very easily and shows more interest towards that topic.
In higher education also practical knowledge gives more experience than studying and understanding. In present world, people are asking for experience on what they have studied. For that purpose we are moving to some other places after completing of university education. If we learnt them in our college level then it seems to be the perfect knowledgable person. The time we spend for learning one fact will take about one day. But by showing really will takes few hours. By this way of learning we can reduce the wastage of time.
Learning things practically will gives the more experience. I completely agree that maximum number of schools and colleges are spending more time on learning facts rather than implementing it.

Votes
Average: 8 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...tical learning plays an important role, with out practical experience the theoretical fa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...concentrating. At their small ages they seems to learn alot. And it will be in their ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hird class. I see an intresting topic on their science book. How the stratch is f...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ter completing of university education. If we learnt them in our college level the...
^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
...out one day. But by showing really will takes few hours. By this way of learning we c...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...time. Learning things practically will gives the more experience. I completely agree...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, then, third, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1198630137 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73868773134 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3508524269 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.2916666667 106.682146367 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.1666666667 20.7667163134 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.45833333333 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 3.4128256513 469% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252346366235 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659644445369 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668272869806 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182649859282 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710335327323 0.056905535591 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 50.2224549098 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.