Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that public health can be improved by increasing the number of sports facilities, while others think that it is hardly effective and other measures should be taken. It is hard to choose one of the ideas as correct, before discussing both of them.
Some think that public health issues can be solved just by adding more sports facilities. However, this proposal assumes that the main reason why people are unhealthy is that they lack access to such facilities. In reality, the causes may include work stress, a lack of time and poor diet. Furthermore, adding more facilities cannot help all people because it is possible to improve health without special equipment as well. As walking, running in the streets and doing such kind of exercises can help people to achieve this, it seems that a lack of access to facilities is not really the cause for poor public health. Thus, by adding more facilities, it is really hard to improve people’s health in public level.
Clearly, other steps should be taken to tackle the problem. If people have no time to do exercises, it is reasonable to increase public awareness of the idea that taking time out from the pressures of work has health benefits. To deal with the problem of unhealthy food, it is effective to encourage people to eat more nutritious food rather than the junky alternative. Nevertheless, not everybody will miss out on work or simply change their food preference. Therefore, there is no really simple solution to solve the public health problems.
In conclusion, people’s health is not poor due to unavailability of sports equipment and there are other causes for it. Thus, it is more realistic to think about changing people’s working habits and diets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94539249147 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60633785346 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532423208191 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9407338719 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313730294237 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105541693065 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859217502231 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202273206612 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714005409617 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.