Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There are different views about whether people should accept some bad situations, such as unsatisfactory job and a lack of money, or they should try to improve them. There are both pros and cons to each case.
Accepting an unpleasant situation can rarely benefit a human-being. It cannot be disagreed that, compared with high salary jobs, the ones with lower salaries, and that are unsatisfactory have fewer responsibilities. As a result, the people who are employed in such jobs can certainly improve their mental health or moods. However, this is for only certain cases and people who are in bad situations are more likely to get depressed. It can be due to the lack of money and problems associated with it. If people cannot afford their day-to-day necessities, such as electricity and gas bills or food expenses, they are unlikely to feel happiness. Thus, to avoid dealing with problems does not have any huge advantages.
Although there can be some consequences when trying to improve in tough days, there are obvious benefits as well. In today’s competitive world, it is really hard to find a satisfactory job, even after so many trials or applications for such jobs. Therefore, in this situation, people can be under huge stress. Nevertheless, it is also possible to succeed and earn some money in other fields, such as business. If someone manages to create a successful business, it can obviously lead to better life as they can be financially more stable. When people have more money, they will have more opportunities as well. These may include travelling, buying new cars or houses. Clearly, it is better to try in any unpleasant situation.
In conclusion, it is highly unlikely that people will improve their lives if they take no action on their problems. Therefore, it is more preferable to try to deal with them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95454545455 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86305468663 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8646269762 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3157894737 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269401678481 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763234129384 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677785293158 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16918496098 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081463293899 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.