Some people say that governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is often discussed that governments should spend resources on addressing environmental pollution and housing problems to assist people to prevent illness and disease. While I agree that this is necessary for our society, I believe that governments should weigh up carefully the range of the budget which spending on this practical social issue.
It is necessary that governments offer suitable and healthy surroundings and provide sufficient space for the citizen. The governments have to erect quite a few facilities which can clear water or collect and cover trash to avoid the cities polluted; therefore, governments spend more budget on this project than others. In addition, the housing space lacking is the general problem in the city, as a result, governments have to increase the budget for the public housing project which can solve the lacking housing problem. However, during these processes of constructing, it will cause the pollution which could influence human health.
On the other hand, there are several methods can be used to address the original factor - the overgrowth population which cause aforementioned pollution and problems. The governments should use part of the budget to develop the secondary cities to alleviate the growing population in the main cities. Through dispersing population to the secondary city, it is helpful to alleviate the problems such as crowded traffic, lacking space and insufficient medical treatment; therefore, the citizen can use the space which was planned to be a public housing, a hospital or a highway.
In general, I agree that addressing existing environmental problems is absolutely necessary, but nevertheless I believe that the methods which can address the original factors of environmental problem are also worthy considered and executed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...sing existing environmental problems is absolutely necessary, but nevertheless I believe that the me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...ental problems is absolutely necessary, but nevertheless I believe that the methods which can ad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, in general, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51612903226 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94908970736 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519713261649 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7156916878 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.9 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213046851866 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934601029981 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107131021876 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141014767017 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846103496135 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.