It is often discussed that governments should spend resources on addressing environmental pollution and housing problems to assist people in preventing illness and disease. While I agree that this is necessary for our society, I believe that governments should carefully weigh the range of the budget to be spend on this social issue.
It is necessary for governments to offer suitable and healthy surroundings and provide sufficient space for citizens. The governments have to erect facilities which can clear water or collect and cover trash to avoid pollution; therefore, governments may spend more budget on this project than others. In addition, the housing space lacking is the general problem in the city, as a result, governments have to increase the budget for the public housing project, which can solve the problem of lack housing. However, during these processes of constructing, it may cause the pollution which could influence human health.
On the other hand, there are several methods can be used to address the original factor - the overgrowth population which may have caused aforementioned pollution and problems. The governments should use part of the budget to develop the secondary cities to alleviate the growing population in the main cities. Through dispersing population to the secondary city, it can help to alleviate the problems such as crowded traffic, lacking space and insufficient medical treatment; therefore, citizens can use the space which was planned to be a public housing, a hospital or a highway.
In general, I agree that addressing existing environmental problems is absolutely necessary, but nevertheless I believe that the methods which can address the original factors of environmental problem are also worthy considered and executed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...sing existing environmental problems is absolutely necessary, but nevertheless I believe that the me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...ental problems is absolutely necessary, but nevertheless I believe that the methods which can ad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, in general, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48913043478 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9821504989 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518115942029 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.665799079 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.5 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203332120313 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914909832684 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106940112539 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139228697167 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089921973666 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.