In some countries, museums charge people for admission, while in some other countries, people are admitted into museums free of charge. Do you think the advantages of charging admission outweigh its disadvantages?
It is ordinary that being charged for admission fee in some countries, whereas in some others, people are allowed to enter into museums without fees. I believe that the benefits of charging admission are absolutely advantageous to maintain a museum.
As all know, charging for admission could cause several disadvantages. The visitor decreasing, for example, some people think that the price of admission should be reduced and even for free. The free charge could strengthen the motivation which people want to visit the museums. Although charging admission can be an income for the museums, the purpose of establishing museum is sharing knowledge for the masses. In addition, some believe that the museums should provide the different exhibition with the identical price of admission. Under this circumstance, in order to balance the budget which used to hold an exhibition, the museums have to decrease the number of times which holding a particular exhibition.
In order to maintain the museums, it is reasonable that charging the appropriate price of the admission fee. According to the visitor’s age, the governments will provide the different range price of admission. In Taiwan, for example, the admission fee of an adult usually more than a child or an elderly. The museums can be supported by the income to offer better surroundings for visitors; moreover, the income can be used to invite some popular performers or to hold an international exhibition. The governments even could use the income to be the budget which can provide free of charge admission for the low-income family members. The part of the best, the income can be the part of the budget which used to erect the next new museums in the future.
In conclusion, it is clear that the charge of admission fee can provide more beneficial assistance and the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...f an adult usually more than a child or an elderly. The museums can be supported by the in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sion for the low-income family members. The part of the best, the income can be the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19078947368 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91639624126 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453947368421 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8514608072 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.2 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342804090082 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134189729443 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941149594319 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253134740729 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12924098384 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.