The history subject is valued significantly by some people nowadays whereas others consider science and technology disciplines are more cruicial. It seems to be difficult to balance these subjets, while I contends that history course should not be appreciated more important than that two courses. I elaborate on my views as follows.
"Those who forgot history can not embrace the future." As former German prime minister Merkel said, the history is essential for us. First of all, we should not deny the importance of history on us. I we do not know who we are, what happened to our predcessors, we may not know what the consequence of the work we are doing now. As the the economy of some major countries plunging, we could find some clue what happened after the great recession 1929 in the US. Thus wiser policies could be made based on these histories.
On the other hand, if we just put the history class in the first place, we may not enjoy lots of benifits brought by some enterprises. Vehicles, for instance, BMW made fighters for German airfore during the War I, so did the Volkswagen, they made tanks in War II. If we just hate the German due to their crimes, boycotting every product from this country, we may not have the chance to drive excellent cars manufactured by these companies afterforth. Let alone the Addidas and Puma.
Moreover, we could not make living from histroy. As for the science and technology courses,however, sutdent can learn to have skills as well as the basic rules of this phisic world while the history could not teach even how to fix the broken bulb. Thus as my concern science is the basic philosophy of our living world, technology is the application of science, they are so important that we can not live with out them. As for students, they should take these courses at first place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'contend'
Suggestion: contend
...icult to balance these subjets, while I contends that history course should not be appre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...quence of the work we are doing now. As the the economy of some major countries plungin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...quence of the work we are doing now. As the the economy of some major countries plungin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ter the great recession 1929 in the US. Thus wiser policies could be made based on t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...s for the science and technology courses,however, sutdent can learn to have skills as we...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... teach even how to fix the broken bulb. Thus as my concern science is the basic phil...
^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...y are so important that we can not live with out them. As for students, they should take...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, for instance, as well as, first of all, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.765625 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63589813619 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1847825393 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3125 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186959033593 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633845520289 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714977564072 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130252397308 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864627795083 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.