There are a large number of subjects for students to learn in today's world. Some people believe that hisory cannot contribute to students' real life. But I argue that historical course can also teach students many experiences.
Some people think history can provide many experiences about success, and these are certainly significant in their real life. There are many historical models that are described in the courses. And students can learn a lot about the characters' qualities that can lead them to success. Therefore, these models encourge students to cultivate the same qualities,and so that be more experienced in success and making proper choices in their future life.
Some other people argue that some other subjects such as science and math can teach students more pratical skills that are necessary in their lives. Many pratical courses can provide them with many basic knowleges that can be used in their future work place or university. For example, students who learn math well can do better in data analysis , researches and statistics, and all of these are essential parts of their university life and future work. By comparison, history is seldom used in their workplace.
In my view, students can learn a lot about traditional cuture from history, and they can help them behave better in their daily life. In the historical courses there are many traditional norms and regulations that are still sueful in the modern society. For example, students can learn how to get along with their friends and parents from historical courses, and this can make them fit in better in the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
There are a large number of subjects for students to learn in today...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...students to cultivate the same qualities,and so that be more experienced in success ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...math well can do better in data analysis , researches and statistics, and all of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10227272727 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52954067089 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9182817332 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111621621915 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513945900917 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671924348601 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819303273362 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385829938106 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.