Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, an increasing number of people are concerned about the fact that trees and greenery are of significant importance in urban areas. I completely agree with the idea that we should plant trees in available urban spaces rather than building housing blocks.
First, it goes without saying that trees play a key role in our daily life. In other words, trees generate oxygen and clean the air from carbon dioxide. People living in residential areas with greenery, subsequently, can have better health. In addition, so necessary are green areas for cities' ecosystems that they attract various wildlife, such as insects, butterflies, birds or bees. As it follows, it is planting trees in cities and towns that can bring numerous advantages to people and the environment. On the contrary, living in concrete districts without plants may lower the quality of life.
That is not to say that constructing habitats in the vaant territories of the urban area is not crucial. Constructing buildings, of course, an provide human beings with safety, security and shelter. In other words, as a roof over the head an save people from a wide range of calamities, housing is one of the fundamental requirement for humankind. Building more homes in empty spaces, therefore, is a crucial way of meeting the demand of urban residences. Nevertheless, constructing buildings in unoccupied territories is a minor solution to solve the problems of urban dwellers.
In conclusion, I would argue that planting trees can be considered the single most critical element for the presence of people on the Earth, despite the few advantages of establishing homes in the city regions. Only by doing so, can the planet become better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, an increasing numbe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s rather than building housing blocks. First, it goes without saying that trees...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... plants may lower the quality of life. That is not to say that constructing hab...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ial. Constructing buildings, of course, an provide human beings with safety, secur...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ial. Constructing buildings, of course, an provide human beings with safety, security and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...In other words, as a roof over the head an save people from a wide range of calami...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... solve the problems of urban dwellers. In conclusion, I would argue that planti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as for, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09574468085 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82932727025 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3444041984 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250837797279 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708972494329 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606506530863 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137181531487 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047627775513 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.