Many different countries have most shops and products as the same. Some consider it a positive development, whereas others consider it negative. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Although it is commonly believed that the effects of globalization such as the same products and shops is a pragmatic evolution, it is sometimes thought that this is an adverse expansion. From my perspective, deciding whether this issue is detrimental or beneficial should depend on the balance of production between international and domestic products.
On the one hand, some people think that increasing ubiquity in terms of the selection of products in shops is a positive trend. In other words, owing to the availability of different stock of varieties as compared to the past, the reach of common public increase. Since import and export business dwell between countries, it makes the economy of involved nations prosper in a positive direction. According to a recent survey taken place in the University of Oxford, the export-import business helped the economy of India to boost by 7% after the great recession period occured in 2007. In addition, people have more choices, as now everything is available everywhere. This means that people are able to purchase things not only be made in local area but also from all over the world.
On the other hand, it is considered by some that globalization cause local vendors serious problems. In other words, the less society take interest in local brands in contrast to the merchandise from foreign companies, the more shops get closed and the more people become jobless. Take some Eastern countries as a prime example, approximately 40% of workers lose their work due to more inclination towards Western production. Moreover, it is these similarities that dilute the national identities. This means that malls in any country have the same showrooms of the same brands that there is no charm of going anywhere for buying something unique.
In conclusion, despite this issue widen the reach of community as well as helping the economic segment of a country to boom, I believe it would be better if government do not ignore the adverse effects that it has on people's lives and the whole country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, in contrast to, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05325443787 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8019297896 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3317672128 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165556299293 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523913772326 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464106132143 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837894222894 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470008381933 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.