Many different countries have most shops and products as the same. Some consider it a positive development, whereas others consider it negative. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Globalisation has ushered in a lot of similarities across a wide range of products. Some believe this to be a boon, while others are of the opine that this has detrimental effects. This essay will shed light on both the perspectives. I, however, support the former thought.
To commence with positives, people have better choices, as everything is available everywhere. This gives a sense of uniformity among the people. For instance, in the past people in India had only two brands of shoes to choose from, that is Bata and Carona. But now brands like puma, adidas, nike and many more are available in the Indian market. This is possible due to the rise in trade. Additionally, countries involved in importing and exporting goods have better relations, which can help them to improve each other’s economic conditions. For example, many of the middle eastern countries involve in exchange of oil with other necessary products like food and water which is scarcely produced due to their unsupported climatic conditions.
On the other hand, people have become so involved in buying these globalised goods that they have forgotten about their authentic home-made goods. This has led to huge fall in the vendors selling native materials. For example, in India the usage of nylon as a primary material for clothing is wide spread. This has led to downfall of clothing materials like cotton and khaki which are authentic to India. This phenomenon has bought in death of many local businesses.
In conclusion, similarities in shops and products have both light and dark side, but according to me the merits seem to outweigh the demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... this to be a boon, while others are of the opine that this has detrimental effects. This...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05904059041 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70978884229 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0579395602 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6470588235 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139701999774 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382215137726 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419533368181 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907183539501 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424787826814 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.