The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012.
The table provided depicts the food consumption of each person per week in a European nation over a period of 20 years from 1992 to 2012.
Overall, it is evident that the consumption of meat per a person weekly in a European country from 1992 to 2012 witnessed a plummet while the remaining kinds of food showed a surge, and the figure for vegetables always ranked in the first whereas the opposite was true of cheese.
As can be seen from the table given, the consumption of vegetables of each person per week in 1992 was the largest, with about 2140 grams, which was higher compared to that of meat and wheat, with almost 1148 grams and 837 grams, respectively. Merely 532 grams of bean were consumed per a person weekly, which was 4 times lower than that of vegetables, and the figure for cheese standed in the last position, with approximately 113 grams. There was a leap of the figure for all types of food between 1992 and 2002.
As far as the table is concerned, the consumption of vegetables, wheat and bean of each person per week from 2002 to 2012 gradually bounced to about 2220 grams, 977 grams and 590 grams, respectively. Nevertheless, the figure for meat crashed to almost 1132 grams while that of cheese reached a plateau at 125 grams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table provided depicts the food cons...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... period of 20 years from 1992 to 2012. Overall, it is evident that the consumpt...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ereas the opposite was true of cheese. As can be seen from the table given, the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l types of food between 1992 and 2002. As far as the table is concerned, the co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, nevertheless, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57777777778 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51366242074 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9538372801 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.142857143 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1428571429 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368689477205 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191686589373 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133517610992 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271869571936 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100459673362 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.