It is true that animal testing has been an ongoing process which leads to a number of life-saving breakthroughs in medical history. While I acknowledge that experimenting on animals produces serious ethical problems, I also believe that such research plays an indispensable role in the development of medicines.
On the one hand, opponents of the use of animal experimentations have compelling reasons against this method. First and foremost, it is argued that the procedures performed on living creatures for purposes of assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products can cause them tremendous pain and distress. For example, a great number of rats and mice used in behavioral experiments have to suffer from electric shock and forced swimming which is considered morally wrong. Furthermore, a common argument heard against the use of animals in drug trials is that animals do not naturally suffer from as many diseases as humans do. Therefore, many people think inducing these diseases in animals artificially do not accurately mimic human responses. They claim that using rats, monkeys or primates in laboratory experiments is not only unethical but also ineffective, and other alternatives should be used instead.
On the other hand, I would have to support animal research due to the fact that reliable alternatives may not be always available. Thanks to advanced technology, there have been some more accurate methods such as cell cultures and computer simulations that may help reduce the need for animal testing. However, these methods have limits because they are unable to deal with the extremely complex interactions between molecules and cells as well as do not allow scientists to test disease treatments in a whole living system. This means animal experimentation cannot be replaced completely by even the most sophisticated computer models. As a result, it is necessary to carry on animals testing for new drugs so people can enjoy a better quality of life.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the benefits of using live animals in medical research clearly outweigh the drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32335329341 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99520934141 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607784431138 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.917968268 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235776943817 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782498443384 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392785635672 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120792910371 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650858002121 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.