Some people say that it is necessary to use animals for testing the medicines intended for human beings, others however think it is cruel and unnecessary.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While some individuals claim that the use of animals is paramount for assessing the effectiveness of medicines bound for humans, others argue that it is useless and it is an act of cruelty. This essay will explore both sides of the argument and will support the first idea since protecting people’s health is vital for humanity.
To begin with, the pharmacy industry is committed to help human beings and thus they make experiments with animals. To put in other words, the use of animals in laboratories allow creating new medicines and therapies to protect the whole of society. For example, the vaccine for coronavirus is being tested in animals in order to prevent a plethora of deaths all over the world. In contrast, if those vaccines were being tested in humans in the first trials, many lives will be lost.
Turning on the other side of the argument, the manipulation of animals in order to help human beings could be seen as a crime of living species and should be halted. This is because some people think that humans do not have the right to manipulate animals and even kill them for the sole fact that they are a inferior species. To illustrate this, the testing of certain anticoagulants provokes the death of million of rats on a daily basis. However, I believe that the benefits that this brings to the entire humanity such as improving the overall health, overshadow the flawed argument of being an act of cruelty.
To conclude, although experimenting with animals in order to help humans could be interpreted as an offense, I think that the manipulation of animals to enhance people health is vital for the sake of the whole planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ll them for the sole fact that they are a inferior species. To illustrate this, t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in contrast, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79020979021 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62574143231 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534965034965 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.6176852316 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.545454545 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335479362434 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128580507489 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649983405614 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215478092426 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214747545391 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.