Today, TV channels provide man's sport show more than women's sport show.
Why?
Should TV channel give equal time for women's sport and men's sport?
It is clear that in modern times the vast majority of the sports shows are related to man’s competitions rather than women’s sports events. This essay will first discuss that the reason for this is that males are more likely to achieve higher level of professionalism, secondly, this essay agrees that female sports events should be given the same amount of time on the sports channels because of the great incentive that could generate to young girls.
To begin with, the level of expertise in sports is usually higher in males than in females. Therefore, more man’s sports events are commonly seen in the TV. This is because the society is often more attracted to watch the highest level of competition in sports. For example, the end point of the Paris 42k marathon has always been reached firstly by a man due to the fact that men’s run faster than woman’s, hence, the people who watch sports channel want to see the faster score and put apart the woman’s performance.
On the other hand, female sports should be given the same importance in the TV due to the fact that they would encourage youngers to practice more sports. That is to say that If young girls are persuaded by sports channels to practice sports they will be more woman’s that become professionals. To illustrate this, Brazilian ESPN sports channel released 10 years ago a new tv show where they only provide women’s competitions on a daily basis. As a consequence, there are 20% more female Brazilian sports professionals than before.
To conclude, there is no doubt that mens are more likely to outperform in sports than women. Therefore, people have a preference on watching males competitions on TV. Besides this, TV woman’s sports events should be provided at the same frequency than man’s in order to encourage youngsters to become sport experts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94230769231 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59975217552 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9940825901 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.615384615 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529078326311 0.244688304435 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210558947425 0.084324248473 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997153524349 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356238184517 0.151304729494 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538264073101 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.