Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should take responsibility for it.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is suggested by some people that conserving the environment is government’s job, whilst there are other people who believe everyone should take part in. It seems that without the help of ihe individuals, it is impossible to preserve our environment.
On the one hand, it is naively suggested that government should take care of environment single-handedly. This view implies that those who are in power can preserve our environment by introducing legislation. This view holds that as government pass new law, it becomes a cultural practice. For example, provided that political leaders raise taxes on fossil fuels, people tend to use their private car less often. Other than that, government can define a fine for people who litter on streets. These methods might seem a little bit harsh, but it would pay off in the long run.
There are, on the other hand, those who claim that individuals should take part in protecting the environment, which seems more logical. Their main observation is that government does not have access to everywhere and cannot take care of refuses in, for example, remote areas. People who live in rural areas should handle their refuses by their own, in that there is no administrator who can transfer the refuses to the landfill and burn or burry them, so people should do appropriate measures themselves. Other than that, ordinary people can help saving the environment by doing as much as they can. As an instance, they can use their own reusable grocery bags when they are going for shopping and do not use plastic bags. With theses straightforward and cost-effective tasks we, as a part of society, can protect our environment.
On balance, the mindset that it is government’s job to protect the environment can be more harmful than good. People who hold this view tent to not contribute in saving the planet and litter and do other things that are dangerous for the environment. I think that, it is true that those who are in power can protect our world by passing legislation, individuals, however, have to pay their debts to our world too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... on streets. These methods might seem a little bit harsh, but it would pay off in the long...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... There are, on the other hand, those who claim that individuals should take p...
^^
Line 9, column 550, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...her than that, ordinary people can help saving the environment by doing as much as the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, for example, i think, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 7.30460921844 342% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97443181818 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89048644128 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508522727273 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5959893429 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254007762489 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894778744045 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711753866192 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180479079823 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364503533937 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.