Some people say that we are wasting our money in the space race. We need to spend money on earth. Do you agree or disagree with this.
It is undisputed that the willingness of all nations is tremendously increasing to delve on the other planets for existence of humans. Presently, some people opine that spending treasurer in the space exploration is waste of money. So that, spending money on earth should be the priority of every nation. Here, I would like to accord with the given statement firmly and some logical points will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
There are manifold points to endorse my point of view. first and the foremost, spending money to explore the outer space is not lucrative for the nations. To demonstrate, nations can not colonize humans on the other planets because environment is not suitable for human survival. For instance, a study found that, Human settlements is impossible in mars due to unavailability of oxygen and people could not stand on the surface because of no gravitational force. So, there is no any reason to invest money in space exploration programmes.
Further, emphasizing in my point of view, our own earth is facing a lot of brutal issues. To be specific, global warming and depletion of ozone layer are on the top of table have elicit a harsh environment for the adaptation of humans. So, government of all nations should invest financial resources to minimize these global issues. What is more, they should invest money on the development of techniques that use renewable source of energy such as solar energy, water et.cetera.
To recapitulate, undeniably, people are becoming fascinated for the exploration of space. But, It is clear that government must focus on the prevailing issue that are facing by every nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...old points to endorse my point of view. first and the foremost, spending money to exp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...of no gravitational force. So, there is no any reason to invest money in space exp...
^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'elicited'.
Suggestion: elicited
...zone layer are on the top of table have elicit a harsh environment for the adaptation ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, for instance, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09558823529 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86797697951 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8155789561 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177132847929 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662138295244 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821365752463 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106191064997 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669226969828 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.