Some people tend to take temporary jobs, for they have the time to do other things. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, there has been a tendency that many people choose part-time jobs over full-time occupations in order to reserve their time for personal reasons. While taking temporary jobs offers a few benefits, the consequences this trend brings should not be underestimated.
To begin with, having a part-time job has several merits for ordinary people. Most of these occupations do not require people to attend in the working hours. Thus, individuals can arrange their schedules more flexibly because they are allowed to choose the shifts that suit them. Moreover, many temporary jobs have been made available on the market for job seekers these days. As a result, people can change from one job to another frequently because they want to experience new environment after a short working period.
However, participating is this kind of jobs seems to have more negative impacts. Firstly, most individuals who are looking for these jobs are mainly in the age group of under 25, which means these people are often undergraduate students. Indeed, they need money for accommodations and tuitions; but, spending too much time on these jobs makes them lose concentration on their study. Consequently, their future could be ruined by continuous failures in examinations. Secondly, the salary of these occupations is usually low which people cannot expect to improve their living standards. In the long term, they would definitely regret about their decisions in the past.
In conclusion, temporary jobs might be a good idea to save time and make a living in a short term. However, this trend has too many disadvantages in the long run.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21292775665 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7991299458 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608365019011 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0085913624 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197717084535 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658590851164 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038175948683 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123891103993 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377276959802 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.