Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some are of the opinion that students be let to study whatever they prefer in university, while others think that students should be restricted with options for subjects that are only useful for the future. Studying in their field of passion allows students to excel in their career, but the demand for people with knowledge in science and technology drives people to force students joining university to pursue courses related to it. I believe in allowing students to choose studies of their choice in the tertiary education.
The opinion of letting students to join courses they like in university is solely for the benefit of the student. Studying a subject of their liking never will be a work or an extra effort, rather, a joyful activity. This allows students to engage and involve with what they study in-depth, and as a result, they tend to perform well in their career with ease. University of Berkley found that students who joined aeronautics because of their parent’s compulsion performed poorly compared to those who joined the same course to follow their passion. Thus, it is clearly evident that students perform well and it is indeed a benefit for them if they study in accordance with their passion.
However, the need for the science graduates and engineers stresses the university students to study courses related to science and technology by some people. The massive development over the last century and predicted developments in the future outlay a loud requirment of science students. For instance, the leap of wired land-line telephones to wireless mobile phone within a decade because of rising demand, it took more than the existing number of engineers, and if this is going to be the case in future, the number of engineers to work in technology will be of an exponential rise to what it is today. This the reason for peopleto advise students to join science courses to meet the furture demand.
To counclude, some people want the choice of tertiary education to be of student’, as each individual has their own distinctive like, while others want university students to study science related courses to meet the demand of technology graduated in the future. I completely agree with the former’s view because it benefits a student if they were allowed to pursue the choice of their passion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...rs, and if this is going to be the case in future, the number of engineers to work in tec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is today. This the reason for peopleto advise students to join science courses ...
^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students to join science courses to meet the furture demand. To counclude, some...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02319587629 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66853409898 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469072164948 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1115604645 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.214285714 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372757508882 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145937085962 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932479494967 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254129594684 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922087687274 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.