Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and

Skills learned un universities should fit the job positions which workforce should be educated fundamental subjects in order to help increase efficiency in society.

First of all, preparing for future in order to occupy job positions needs initial infrastructures such as proper, accurate, and up to date consultants with adolescents from their high school life. As students don’t have a big picture of their study subjects and don’t be able to make decisions based on reality, they begin to walk in the wrong way.

If a student has enormous interest in a special field, it should be described widely and all consequences of choosing this study subject from social level to amount of probable needs in the world should precisely be discussed by professional consultants.

By explaining probable problems that every student may face in the future in his/her career they will be able to think more about their interests and it will help them to choose their study subjects more reasonably. However, for gifted children using every fortune to create new things, limitations in choosing field of study may not be meaningful. Therefore, these group of students need more chances to improve their skills and make new ideas.

All in all, study fields should be matched with job positions and all students should be justified. Without proper programming, society will be full of workforces that there is not any job position for them or they will be in wrong positions. Therefore, it will be caused psychological disorders and a society with mentally sick people that don’t have enough efficiency.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...ate new things, limitations in choosing field of study may not be meaningful. Therefo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, therefore, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78461538462 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0120818128 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370792981432 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15113827847 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788203514243 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206910868413 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551481904808 0.056905535591 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.