Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is believed by some people that all the university students must be allowed to study whatever they are interested in. Whereas, others think that they have to be allowed study subjects that benefit them in them. In my opinion, students should be allowed to study whatever they like.
Some people that it is advantageous if students in the university can study whatever they like. Firstly, any student can gain more knowledge from their subjects if they concentrate and study those subjects. Students cannot focus on a subject in which they are not interested. As a result, they get lower grades in those subjects.
Some people argue that children should be allowed to study subjects such as those related to science and technology which will be helpful for their future development. There are many job opportunities in the fields like science and technology. As a result, students can definitely get employed in the future. People can earn good income by doing those jobs. These jobs also involve creativity since many inventions are being made in these fields. People doing these jobs gain huge respect from many people. The salary gained from these jobs increase every year in order to meet the increasing costs of daily products in the market.
According to my opinion, students must be allowed to study their favorite subjects. Although subjects such as technology and science related are useful for students, they cannot excel in the fields in which they are not interested. As a result, they will be not satisfied even if they gain a job in those fields in future. There will be more stress on people if they don't have enough knowledge in their job fields. Besides, there are also employment opportunities in other fields in which students are interested in. For instance, a student cannot be forced to become an engineer if he/she is interested in arts. That student will lead a comfortable life in future if he/she is allowed to purse their studies in arts rather than in engineering.
In conclusion, students must be allowed to study whatever they like rather than what is useful for them in future like science and technology related subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... study whatever they are interested in. Whereas, others think that they have to be allo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...even if they gain a job in those fields in future. There will be more stress on people if...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e will be more stress on people if they dont have enough knowledge in their job fiel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98898071625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.555250491 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402203856749 0.561755894193 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4466504275 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3181818182 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.57408058603 0.244688304435 235% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185113403272 0.084324248473 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138143104859 0.0667982634062 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.372147615462 0.151304729494 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972919718138 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.