Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Men and women are equally competent for many tasks. A person's ability to do physical tasks depends on the person's physical strength. A person's intellect to perform tasks depends on their mental ability. The eligibility for most of the tasks is not whether a person is a man or woman.
Firstly, physical strength is not the requirement in all jobs. For instance, consider the case of a CEO of a company like Google. Anyone who can contibute to the success of the company can become the CEO of Google. It is not the case that only men are mostly suited for this post as they are physically strong compared to women. A person's mental ability is more important than physical strength to become CEO of Google. So, in the tasks which involve using of person's intellect, men and women are equally capable.
Secondly, there are many tasks in this world which require more physical strength than mental ability. Men and women are equally suited for those tasks despite their inherent physical differences. They are equally suited because it all depends on their stamina to do it. There is no evidence that most of the men in this world are more physically fit compared to women. A person's physical strength helps in deciding if he/she is capable to do the physical tasks.
However, there are few tasks for which men and women are not equally capable. For instance, only women can give birth to children. In the jobs which involve carrying heavy loads, men are more suited than women because of their inherent physical differences. But if women can train themselves better for doing those jobs, then women can be equally capable as men for doing those tasks.
A person is not selected to do a task depending on whether he or she is a man or woman. Their selection to any job is mostly based on their capabilities and experience. In today's world, men and women are equally competing in most of the fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Pranav Lohote | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | motherastronaut12 | 58 | view |
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 55
- All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks 58
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 67
- Three years ago because of flooding at the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve 100 lions and 100 western gazelles were moved to the East Palean Preserve an area that is home to most of the same species that are found in the western preserve though in larger 55
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals One year ago we introduced our first product Bargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Alth 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...are equally competent for many tasks. A persons ability to do physical tasks depends on...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...nds on the persons physical strength. A persons intellect to perform tasks depends on t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: A person; Persons
...re physically strong compared to women. A persons mental ability is more important than p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70958083832 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43770866515 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.380239520958 0.4932671777 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.7541187253 60.3974514979 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.5 118.986275619 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288588001126 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109825489234 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810226384896 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189445927339 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703434025831 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.