Attending university is one of the imperative ways in order to attain the necessary professional knowledge for students’ future career paths. Therefore, some people contend that students should be allowed to follow their own choices of majors; however, opponents stay that university learners should only be permitted to study fields which are related to science and technology since they are extremely supportive in the next decades. In my opinion, I strongly support the former idea because of several reasons.
On the one hand, there are various motives why some people believe that university students should only choose careers related to the above fields. Firstly, only by studying those developed majors can young people contribute significantly to the development of modern society. We do need more breakthrough in medicines, artificial intelligence, biological research and the like in order to tackle the current detrimental issues like overpopulation and environmental problems. Secondly, jobs in those sought after markets will absolutely help students earn numerous bucks. Therefore, they will be able to live independently and support their whole families as well. On the contrary, a lot of people enter the market of science and technology also causes a remarkable abundance. Consequently, a host of scientists and technical employees will not be able to enter the workforce.
On the other hand, to assure the balance of the workforce and students’ interests, students are encouraged to take part in majors that they like. There are other imperative majors related to education, agriculture, and services which need a lot of people. Therefore, only by letting students choose a variety of majors can we balance the job market. For example, if a country does not have many farmers, there will be not enough food supply for both domestic and export purposes. Moreover, in terms of students’ hobbies, being allowed to study and work in their favorite aspect, students will feel comfortable environment at work, which results in the increase of work efficiency, competition among workers and also creativity.
In conclusion, students should have the right to choose majors freely rather than science or technology since it brings far more advantages. Therefore, teachers and parents should give them proper advice to reinforce their opinion of their future career.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50948509485 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96133677586 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566395663957 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4520803004 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.588235294 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5882352941 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349573608441 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960677468276 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791405053731 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206259824407 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764197944094 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.