In recent years, the importance of art as a school subject is gaining a great deal of attention throughout the society. Most importantly, the issue has been a bone of contention among the pedagogical experts and pundits regarding its inclusion in the syllabus. While some critics consider spending time for art as a wastage, I would contend that it should be considered as a mandatory subject for the children at a certain level at the school.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that art promotes creativity. This means the kids who are being exposed to this sort of activities, exert constructive and innovative thoughtfulness. Therefore, these school children are being discouraged for violent and crime-related actions in the long run. In an empirical survey conducted in Britain last year by the Education Ministry reflects the same notion. The survey shows the children who had art in their curriculum till 5th grade, were 35% more creative thinkers than their counterparts who were more involved in other issues rather than arts and cultural things. Furthermore, those students showed a more positive attitude in every aspect in their next periods of life.
Conversely, some critics suggest that improving creativity through art does not necessarily improves the future prospects of them in the job market. To their understanding, it keeps them quite vulnerable to cope up with the current competitive landscape of life. This, in turn, may contribute to feeling insecure in the future world. Therefore, parents who are giving more emphasis on other practical things of life, are actually preparing their kids best -fitted for their betterment. This can be exemplified by the initiatives in Japan for the last few decades, where the government is subsidising the educational costs for learning productive knowledge. This is being reflected in Japan’s growth of GDP in the last five years from 2% to 12%, and thus the fund spent on vocational education is really worthy. Hence, to them, having art in the school subject seems a mundane issue.
All things considered, the value of art should not be discounted for the sake of a growing economy. I personally believe, young aspirants should be deterred from the typical rate race of materialistic success with money matters. Rather, they should spend on the mental development of the future generation which can be fortified at a great level by the means of art and cultural activities at their initial ages of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'improve'
Suggestion: improve
...tivity through art does not necessarily improves the future prospects of them in the job...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, furthermore, hence, if, may, really, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14603960396 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89311754929 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2393806641 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.421052632 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186254167766 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539271742943 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634479102602 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120987463864 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631447592047 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.