Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, along with the development of many main roads, road safety becomes one of the most concerned problems among society. Many people argue that the optimal method to enhance road safety is to raise legal driving age. In my opinion, that way just works well in short term, yet in long term there are better measures that we should consider.
To begin with, people under legal driving age should be banned from driving because of some reasons, including youngsters’ disruptive behavior and deficiency of experience in taking part in traffic. First, youngsters are easily affected by peer pressure; when someone dare them to do something dangerous, they can become more aggressive and are willing to take risks. For example, in Vietnam, many inhabitants living beside main roads frequently witness that many young men cross a red light or speed up suddenly on those streets in order to show off braveness with their peers. Second, the majority of traffic incidents are caused by people who do not have much experience of operating vehicles. When they are not used to participating in traffic, they can easily get panic due to several ordinary things such as ambulance siren; therefore, they become more likely to cause unexpected accidents if they keep moving on the roads.
On the other hand, because most youngsters still drive without driving license, raising minimum driving age is only effective to limited extent. There are better methods that can curb the number of traffic accidents, which are providing more education schemes related to road safety and stricter regulations. Through compulsory lessons from childhood, children can not only help to shape their personalities but also raise their awareness when participating in traffic. Furthermore, government should consider imposing harsher punishments, such as fine, license suspension or even imprisonment in order to inhibit people from breaking traffic laws, thus they will not injure themselves and others people.
In conclusion, although raising legal driving age can help to avoid several traffic incidents caused by young drivers, I still believe that better education and stricter regulations are much more effective in enhancing road safety in the long term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | emzin | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison would commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem 84
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in short, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34560906516 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63941798459 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609065155807 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0550719574 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.153846154 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1538461538 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18391458116 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720338913981 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674492208429 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119529487082 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216588787495 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.