It is widely believed that raising the minimum driving age is the most effective way to prevent accidents. While I agree that the increasing driving age makes a significant contribution to reducing accidents, I believe that other methods are equally important and should be taken into account.
On the one hand, I agree that raising the minimum age for obtaining a driving license can be an effective road safety measure. Firstly, older drivers are more mature and gain more experience compared to younger drivers. Therefore, they can make quicker and wiser decisions to avoid potentially dangerous and unpredicted situations on the road. If a person crosses the road suddenly, for example, younger drivers might be frightened and panic, while older drivers might turn or brake the wheel instead. Secondly, increasing the minimum age for driving allows adolescents more time to sharpen their driving skills. They can enroll in defensive driving courses to learn how to deal with various driving scenarios, which will help them minimize the risk of accidents in the future.
On the other hand, I believe that enhanced safety on the road can be achieved through other measures that are more effective than raising the minimum age for driving. To begin with, more stricter regulations should be imposed, which would act as a deterrent to traffic law breakers. For instance, people who run red lights in Singapore are fined heavily, making them more responsible in order to avoid future punishments. In addition, governments should allocate financial resources to improve public transportation, which would encourage residents to drive their private cars or motorbikes less frequently. As a result, these citizens will no longer worry about the risk that they face when driving their own vehicles, such as driving while inebriated or falling asleep behind the wheel.
In conclusion, while raising the legal driving age can help to make our roads safer to some extent, I believe that governments should implement the other road safety methods mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stricter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stricter
...minimum age for driving. To begin with, more stricter regulations should be imposed, which wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r road safety methods mentioned above.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30487804878 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67582207842 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564024390244 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5372627827 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255049659635 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915439056085 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713078825716 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167582377285 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251523368763 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.