Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the rapid development of transportation, especially road transport makes people more concerned about its safety. Some people believe that restricting younger drivers are the best method to make road traffic safer. From my point of view, I strongly disagree with that idea; in this essay, I will try to address causes making road traffic more dangerous and solutions for those problems to support my viewpoint.
To start with, there are various worse reasons causing transport accidents rather than young people. First and foremost, the quality of roads and transport vehicles are vital to drivers’ safety. The roads that have substandard construction quality will be easily degraded, which creates more damages on the paths, whereby raising the possibility of dangerous situations. Secondly, alcohol and drugs, which its users tend to drive fast but easy to lose control, are one of the main factors which cause terrible accidents that directly threaten people’s life; those serious circumstances not only affect the users themselves but also many other people.
Besides that, many better solutions can be applied to tackle the issue. Regarding roads’ quality, it should be maintained periodically to guarantee that it is safe for people to go on. Besides that, governments should construct and encourage citizens using alternative transportation forms, which are more reliable, such as sky-train or subway. Moreover, people need to enhance their awareness about road traffic safety and strictly follow the transportation policies; the government can also increase fines to drug drivers to deter them from driving.
To conclude, I believe that young drivers are not a significant factor reducing safeness on the roads; therefore, increasing the minimum legal age for driving is not the best solution to improve road safety.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, in fact, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56537102473 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82505242874 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639575971731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.717157408 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182045332619 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668172806124 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713804146161 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130005028295 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805370944458 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.