It is argued that raising the minimum age requirement for drivers is the most effective measure to enhance safety on the roads. While this approach can potentially reduce the number of traffic accidents, I believe that enforcing stricter punishments for traffic violations and upgrading public transport will be more practical solutions to address the root causes of road accidents.
Undoubtedly, increasing the minimum legal age for vehicle drivers can decrease some accidents on the roads. In reality, young drivers who might lack experience and immaturity are more likely to engage in reckless and dangerous driving behaviors, putting themselves and other commuters in danger. By requiring individuals to wait until they are older to obtain a formal driver’s license can encourage them to operate their vehicles more responsibly and cautiously, creating a safer and more secure driving enviroment for all road users. For example, some countries, such as Japan and South Korea, where the minimum age for drivers is higher, have had lower accident rates involving young drivers.
However, implementing a higher legal age for drivers does not fully address the underlying causes of traffic accidents. Moreover, roads accidents can stem from various factors, including poor transportation infrastructure and careless driving behaviors, not solely from young commuters. Therefore, imposing stricter penalties for traffic offenders such as heavy fines or extended license suspensions for repeat offenders, would serve as an effective deterrent against reckless driving behaviors. In addition, the government should invest in public transportion enhancement, consisting of providing more bus and train services, which can encourage drivers to less rely on their private vehicles, ultimately leading to fewer road accidents. The Mass Rapid Transit Sytem in Singapore, for example, has successfully reduced the traffic crashes involving younger drivers by introducing a strict law and harsh punishment for traffic violations, along with a well-establishment underground subway system.
In conclusion, although increasing a higher minimum age for drivers can improve road safety by discourage young commuters from reckless driving patterns, I am of the option that enhancements of public transport and harsh penaltines for traffic offenses will the most effective measure to tackle the underlying causes of these issues. I am also convinced that once these regulations are implemented, there will be more people obeying strict laws, which contributes to creating a safety conditions for road users.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76822916667 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97668780722 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5703125 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9497780474 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.384615385 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5384615385 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200405738502 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870610807013 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580433648038 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138558986739 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038910966439 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.78 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76822916667 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97668780722 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5703125 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9497780474 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.384615385 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5384615385 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200405738502 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870610807013 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580433648038 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138558986739 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038910966439 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.78 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.