Some people believe that an increase in fuel prices is the best way to tackle global environmental problems. Although this idea could help reduce harmful fumes, I think there are some better and alternative solution to these issues.
In the first place, not only does the policy of raising the fuel cost burden citizens financially, but it also has very few positive changes in the environment. First, gasoline become more expensive may cause companies whose top priority is making profits increasing the price of their products to cover the arising transportation cost. This result in the goods on the market become less affordable, and citizens have to pay more for their living expenses. Second, raising fuel costs is not the best solution as fuel can be considered one of the most necessities of human kind. No matter how costly it will be, people will still willing to buy it to satisfy their demand, which fails to meet the initial purpose of saving the environment.
Another solution that is able to deal environmental issues without entailing financial difficulties for people in ensuring the quality of mass transit. For example, the government can either allocate national budget for the equipment of modern air-conditioners inside the bus or the addition of bus routes. When people feel comfortable and convenient to use, public transportation will attract more and more passengers which results in the reduction of private vehicles and harmful fumes emissions. This is also what the government in Vietnam have carried out in recent year. Therefore, the local atmosphere is reported to have seen considerable improvements.
In conclusion, although we can't deny the effect of raising the fuel costs, it's still not the best way to solve the environmental problems. In fact, the ideal solution would be raising the quality of mass transit system. Once those solutions are taken, the global environmental problems can slowly improved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ovements. In conclusion, although we cant deny the effect of raising the fuel cos...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23322683706 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83469593181 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607028753994 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4935987969 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257515243582 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808102213463 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907705590611 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163271748718 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808556703769 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.