Some people think that computers and the Internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively.
Discuss both view and give your opinion.
In recent times, it has been debated whether human teachers or technological devices and Internet are more crucial for children’s education. Although there are merits in traditional teaching system, I personally believe that computers and the Internet will take the dominant role in education.
One the one hand, the human-guided teaching method is advantageous to some extent. The main benefit is that children are able to communicate with each other in a classroom, hence developing their interpersonal skills. These skills are of the most vital element for their future career opportunities. In addition, teachers can make lessons more stimulating by holding active games such as puzzles or words guessing, young students therefore find themselves engaged with the lessons.
On the other hand, it seems to me that while human teachers are as essential for education, computers and the internet offer a tremendous assistance to youngsters in terms of studying. Firstly, students nowadays are empowered to do numerous researches online as Internet supplies immense resources of information. As a result, students probably broaden their knowledge fast and effectively without any help. Secondly, children can study at their own pace using the modern technological devices suitably and wisely. For instance, that a computer connected to Internet allows children choose to study what and when at their own levels and timetable is the most powerful tool in self-study.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against each of these teaching methods, but I believe that the online and technological teaching approach will be an indispensible part of education.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58365758755 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04571596076 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6280554407 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204741767175 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700489998623 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555586909057 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121619575522 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412463789608 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.