The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this issue?
It is generally believed that the government should take the responsibility to limit the amount of violence in movies and television as a way to decelerate the violent crimes in society. In my opinion, I agree with this solution but I believe it still present several drawbacks.
One the one hand, I suppose that confining the quantity of violence films is advantageous to some extent. The main benefit is that this approach serves as a remedy to alleviate the incidence of violent crimes from its root. For example, if a person has a tendency to murder another, they probably take experience to commit the crime from negative actions on television or movies. Moreover, such solution offers a tremendous assistance in reducing the crime rate in the future as the current mass media exerts enormous influence on young generation. For example, youngsters who are prevented from watching violence movies have lower possibilies to offend in their future than those who are often exposed to violence scenes.
On the other hand, although there are merits in such strategy, I believe its disadvantages should be considered. Firstly, if the government controls the amount of violence on films or televisions, those products will probably be unrealistic performances. Since one of the key factors of movies is it have to seem like reality, restriction of such factor, thus, leads to the decline in the number of audiences. People therefore are not willing to pay for an action movies which have no or limited violence events. Secondly, film companies and television stations possibly encounter the deceleration of profits on account of the decrease of watchers. As a result, films industry and even the economy of the nation will suffer.
In conclusion, beneficial as the ramification is, I believe there are still several consequences that need to be took into account.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... to pay for an action movies which have no or limited violence events. Secondly, f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16118421053 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91263716344 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8258173982 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255241734616 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079197812008 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736027307096 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141537793327 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102876610974 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.