Some people think that couples should live together before getting married to start knowing each other better and see if they are compatible. Others say that because of this tendency people become immoral and only deep emotional attachment makes a durable alliance.
What is your opinion?
Since the appearance of humanity on the Earth, people have been thinking about creating a family. While some people claim that living together before getting married for couples is necessary, others disagree with them. I am absolutely confident that at the present time cohabitation of people is a good thing.
In my opinion, obtaining sufficient information about a person is possible in-home life only. Many people strive to look better than they really are, and ordinary meetings do not help understand a person for making a decision. In addition, living together allows to see all sides of the soul of a loved one. For example, according to the statistical studies of the Psychological Institute of Kazakhstan, the couples living with each other before marriage break up about 30% less often than others. Hence, moving in together possesses a positive effect for their family and life.
Some opponents of the fact that couples should see if they are compatible or not, stating that in this case people become immoral. However veracious it sounds, I would not agree with the above mentioned idea, since communication between people at home reduces psychological stress from future marriage. As a result of such interaction, prediction of further relationships and understanding what kind of partner you need is possible. For instance, the daughter of my friend Praskovya married a wonderful man after the previous boyfriend turned out to be an incorrigible liar. Thus, a durable alliance can be created in conditions of complete knowledge of a partner and understanding of them.
Taking everything into consideration, it can be concluded that creating conditions for family life before marriage is the key to a happy couple. The right decision can be made after obtaining a complete understanding of the partner, their desires and the future of the family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n they really are, and ordinary meetings do not help understand a person for maki...
^^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about 30% less often than others. Hence, moving in together possesses a positive ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, really, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21666666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92128396429 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5100347791 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256220172788 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786410252605 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929879331499 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145728500925 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878437455938 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.