Some people think that economic development is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others argue that economic development is damaging the environment and needs to stop. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion
While it is believed by some people that reducing poverty and hunger is only done by economic development of any nation, others argue with that it creates detrimental effects on our environment. so, it should be stopped. In my opinion, I consider that saving environment is our first priority.
To embark on it, some people think that economic growth influences the environment and I agree. First and foremost, owing to growth of industries, it creates pollution of air, water and land. In other words, disposing harmful industrial waste in to water or agricultural land, which deteriorates water resources and farming land. For instance, in the survey of time of India, many rivers have been polluted, due to disposal of industrial wastage. As a result, water of rivers will not be able to use by mankind. Secondly, urbanization have negative impacts on rain forests. What I mean, many forests have been cutting down in order to expand of city or build new ones. for example, New York Times revealed that every year 21,000 square of kilometres of forest land have been used to make new town or expand city areas. Hence, above mention activities definitely hazardous for environment.
On the other hand, some people have flawed assumption regarding economic growth indeed helpful for alleviating hungerness and poverty rate. Firstly, they think that economic development can augment employment opportunities for people. If every person has a job, then he will be able to satisfy rudimentary requirements of life. As a result, standard of living can be increased and people are able to eat adequate foods. Secondly, using natural resources for developing economy seems worth it. By increasing economy of nation, we are able to help our people in terms of money and food.
In conclusion, even though economic growth has benefits like better quality of life and sufficient foods, damage of environment which should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...detrimental effects on our environment. so, it should be stopped. In my opinion, I...
^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...er to expand of city or build new ones. for example, New York Times revealed that e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15873015873 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77941176431 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1883017199 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5263157895 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211251270667 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611669917829 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859544227495 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145777671703 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079391682001 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.