Some people think environment problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others, however, think that those problems cannot be solved unless individuals take some action. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is indisputable that the environment has become the most concerned issue in recent years. As a result, it remains a controversy that whether each resident ought to have responsibilities or it might too extensive for them to handle. In my opinion, each of these approaches has its values.
Admittedly, it is reasonable for some to argue that this problem is too big for humanity to resolve. First of all, fighting against some natural disasters such as tsunami, floods, earthquakes might beyond the ability of a normal person. Besides, some humanity destructions are unreachable for some citizens. For example, oil spills lead to a large-scale impact on the suffocation of marine creatures, or smog from industrial zones which fly over the city and cause respiratory affections.
Nevertheless, unless human beings take some actions, the negative influences of human actions could become severely worse. There are a host of actions we might do to alleviate the contamination of surroundings. First and foremost, it is achievable for residents to enhance their awareness of being friendly to their living places. Because one's consciousness associates strongly with and dominates people's behaviors. Besides, the second step is changing people's daily habits, one of which is that they could choose to use public transports instead of private vehicles, or the avoidance of disposal products and high-carbon products. Following these above measures will create modifications to the well-being of the habitat.
To sum up, there are indeed some unavoidable catastrophes, but residents must take more action to develop a sustainable environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ould become severely worse. There are a host of actions we might do to alleviate the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...riendly to their living places. Because ones consciousness associates strongly with ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47244094488 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.128868738 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657480314961 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7421628963 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207406653759 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643563810646 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589118134816 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108214576517 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393386591327 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.