Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the danger of commiting a crime. To what extent do you agree ar disagree?
It is irrefutable that ex-prisoners could become productive members of society when they are released to normal life. I completely agree with the idea that allowing such people to talk to teenagers about their experiences is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law.
In my opinion, teenagers are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak from experiences. Therefore, reformed offenders could share how they get involved in crime and the danger of criminal lifestyle. By pointing the harshness of prison, children are expected to be dispelled any intends to break the rule and anti-society, as well as the idea of prosperous lives, which result from illegal actions. While adolescents tend to indifferent to the guidance given by parents or teachers, I imagine that most of them would be extremely keen on hearing intriguing stories of ex-offenders and drawing their lessons.
On the other hand, the alternatives to using reformed criminals to educate teenagers about crimes are less effective. One option is letting the police visit schools and talk to young people. This could be useful in terms of informing teens about what happens to lawbreakers when they are caught, but teenagers normally reluctant to take advice from figures of authorities. A second is school teacher could talk to their students about crime, but I doubt that students would see teachers as a credible source of information in this field. Eventually, educational films might be informative, but there would be no opportunities for children to interact and make questions.
To sum up, I would argue that people who turned their lives around after serving in a prison sentence could help to deter teenagers from committing crimes
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17081850534 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81564163084 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6484552032 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.083333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185348215339 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657497009446 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585363372829 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129065467668 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056645888529 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.