Some people think that experimenting with animals in laboratories is the best way to ensure new products will be safe for human use.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Experiment with animals for human beings to use new staff is of vital concern to society. Some visionaries, including the speaker, speak of a world in which to confirm the safeness of new manufactures for humans, laboratories experiment by using animals is the most appropriate method. I disagree with this speaker’s idea.
The chief reason for my assertion lies in ethics, especially life importance. In the view point of how life is important, the author’s opinion ignores animal’s life. In fact, animal experiment for human use has at least one merit: the victim of other animals such as a mouse let worse sub or main effect of new products reduced. In other words, other lives rescue human life. However, ethically, human life is not superior to other animal’s life. Significance of life is equal among all creatures. Let us consider two examples to further verify my assertion.
The first example is a laboratory experiment of medicine. As usual, mouse or monkey are used to check how this medicine is effective or involves negative effect on human body. To achieve creating medicine for human use without bad sub effect, thousand or millions experiments are executed repeatedly. This implies that thousand or millions mice or monkeys died for the medicine to save human life.
I next turn to the example of an experiment with rabbits for cosmetic goods. To investigate how cosmetic goods are toxic for human beings, these goods shotted to rabbits eye. These rabbits were binded and toleranted crucial pain for three or four days, and then some of them died due to the pain. Cosmetic goods let women become beautiful without hard negative effect, but their beauty stands on death of a lot of rabbits.
In sum, I would like to stress that speaker’s idea- animal experiment in laboratories is nicest approach to confirm safeness of new manufactures for us to use- neglects importance of animal’s life. Therefore, even though this way has some merits, I do not agree with the author’s idea. I believe that all animal’s life including human beings are equal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...or main effect of new products reduced. In other words, other lives rescue human l...
^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne for human use without bad sub effect, thousand or millions experiments are exe...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... for human use without bad sub effect, thousand or millions experiments are executed re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty stands on death of a lot of rabbits. In sum, I would like to stress that spea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 92, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the nicest'.
Suggestion: is the nicest
...idea- animal experiment in laboratories is nicest approach to confirm safeness of new man...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, at least, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12753623188 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88224981554 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.404295925 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2380952381 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320053162605 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101409264279 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823761483354 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197309423993 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106278600257 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.