Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a belief that celebrities can use their influence to raise public awareness on important matters. However, some people think that famous people may be in charge of making problems underestimated. This essay will discuss both arguments and explain why I believe that the former statement is more convincing.
On the one hand, celebrities can have a positive effect on colossal problems by setting a good example of how to live and act. For instance, Leonardo DiCaprio, a prominent actor, has founded an organization to protect the environment since 1998. Furthermore, he also utilizes the usage of social media and public consciousness to bring the attention of the public to several environmental issues. Famous people like Leonardo that show participation in humanitarian efforts are undoubtedly role models for teenagers.
On the other hand, serious problems can also be undermined owing to celebrities’ scandals. Particularly, if a famous person is involved in an accusation of sexual harassment or drug addiction, criticism for his behavior would appear straightaway. Since he portrays a negative image of himself, calls for a boycott from any brands or organizations, which he represents can also raise. This action will definitely have a counter-argumentative result on those associations as they have been expecting an increase in the number of participants.
In conclusion, not only do celebrities catch the public’s interest in major problems, but they can also undervalue the significance of crucial matters whenever they are involved in scandals. From my point of view, the benefits of having celebrities to be representative of an international organization are much more appealing. If each association was more careful in seeking the influencer, then hopefully famous people would put their power to good use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | hongngocvo | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | hongngocvo | 64 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Samathanary | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | doanhzoompro | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | bihungba1101 | 73 | view |
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens 40
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 78
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about the most popular types of holiday accommodation for the British in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49647887324 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36741057452 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630281690141 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.965538386 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269893868421 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860661869838 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756367133755 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167927987591 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934859439681 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.