Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many are of the opinion that well-known people have a great impact on viewers to concentrate on the problem. Meanwhile, others hold that celebrities cannot help international organizations attract audiences and reduce the importance of the problem. This essay will delve into the logic behind both viewpoints and then present why I am inclined towards the former.
On the one hand, people who think that people think that celebrities support international organizations to attract more people to focus on the problem have their own rationales. Firstly, singers or actresses often perform worldwide during their careers. In other words, they have significantly impacted their fans. For instance, their fans will be ready to support idols if they raise awareness through presentations on TV shows. Besides, they have a high rate of followers on social media platforms, such as Tiktok, Instagram, and Facebook. This leads to represent the voice of international organizations to draw attention to problems.
On the other hand, it is understandable why people argue that a famous person makes the problem ignored and less significant. First of all, celebrities always practice for their performances and arrive in other countries. In particular, they hardly spend time making people pay attention to social issues. Additionally, well-known people have just talked to their fans about daily life and their products. This means that they cannot spread vibes or send messages meaningfully to draw attention. If they knew more about the problem as carefully as experts, they would be successful in attracting more people to care about it.
In conclusion, while other are some benefits of the impact of celebrities on their fans to follow the issues, I still agree with those who think that famous people make the problem unimportant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, so, still, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40625 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92953304634 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565972222222 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8239352198 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307546561108 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100725690158 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940785224198 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204006771495 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282770770514 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.