Some people think genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. other however, agree that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both this views and give your opinion.
It is an obvious truth that for the time being people are applying GM and it is extending all over the world, moreover it kind of debatable issue that GM products are hazardous for human being or it is sorts of positive point for new discovered subject. This essay deal with for and against this controversial issue.
Firstly, for those people who are the fan of this method of production, it is undeniable that amount of products have massively increased due to resistance of crops against pests water stress. Secondly, they believed that the quality of harvest has jumped up because scientists added myriad of beneficial vitamin to products. To give an illustration, wheat and barely in our region had harvested approximately 8 tons per hectare but recently I have heard that it ascended to 20 tons per hectare moreover the quality of products are not comparable with 10 years ago.
On the other hand, people who opposed to spread of this issue who believe that manipulating in nature genetics have a lots of irrecoverable result for aquatic and terrestrial creatures. They believe that genetically modifying crops are not safe for human and environment. Recently scholars have discovered many severe disease in human who had used GM products and the news announced that it have proved for the time being.
By and large if I want to consider all beneficial and drawbacks and also with the points that mentioned above I can tell although GM has developed the horizontal view of science, it threats the healthy life of humans, so personally I prefer government ought to put strict rules on using GM crops.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...ed GM crops are a positive development. other however, agree that they are potentiall...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...at manipulating in nature genetics have a lots of irrecoverable result for aquatic and...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to put strict rules on using GM crops.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, kind of, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75750289614 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.727528342 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208615162926 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110944127858 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139652233559 0.0667982634062 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168666832514 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.245253709172 0.056905535591 431% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.