Some people think that genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Genetically modified crops are the foremost development of genetic engineer in science for the positive development, but, however, some argue that it can be dangerous for public health. In this essay, I will discuss on both positive and negative view in this essay.
On one hand, some scientists are against of genetic modified crops, due to aware of people’s health. As of them, it harms the health, physically and mentally and result will be shown in near future. Later, the number of mental and physical disorder people will increase in the world. For example, different medicine and harmful chemical injected in genetic crops for more production is like slow poison for body and mind. In 2012 one sort of genetically modified rice in Brazil found that includes a typical resistance bacterium that produces a poisonous substance which is potentially harmful for mental activities It should be totally ban and give focus on organic agriculture. By the various researches done by WHO in previous year, also show that it contain harmful poison to use.
Other side, some expertises are giving more important and attention on the development of modern biotechnology for the huge production of genetic crops. They have admitted that, it can be positive development, for the alleviation of starvation and poverty from different developing countries. By help of biotechnology, we can produce fruits, vegetable in large quantity and size and also it contain different vitamins and minerals, which help to control malnutrition of child in underdeveloped or developing countries like, Sudan, Nigeria and many others. The research and dedication of many years, genetic engineer can develop biotechnology and it can be efficient to reduction shortage of foods in coming days.
In conclusion, it has both merits and demerits of using genetic crops, however, I support of using genetically crops for the prevention of food scarcity from the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-24 | foadihasan | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | nexuse | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | tanthao123456 | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-03 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples fr 73
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples fr 67
- The graphs below show how people in a European city reached their office and got back home in 1959 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both the views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contains'?
Suggestion: contains
... in large quantity and size and also it contain different vitamins and minerals, which ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28802588997 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89948493936 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559870550162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1352594273 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.692307692 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234987155629 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828972164627 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656504683531 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151776343473 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716641205381 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.