Some people think the government should spend money on technology while the others think it should be for free education. Discuss both views and give your idea.
It is a topical debate whether the national authorities should allocate the technology advance or free education to their residents. The following essay takes a look at both sides of the argument.
To begin with, the benefits which the high tech has brought are many. Firstly, people will enjoy the life with a massive convenience thanks to the improvement of technology. Just with a click of mouse, we can go shopping for daily basis or purchase any items with details; this reduces the time for travelling and generally is cost-effective. Furthermore, the machines with AI have contributed to the variety of industries to increase the productivity. Robots nowadays have been developed to gradually take the blue-collar jobs, thus it saves more labors which used to be the main force in any industrial field.
On the other hand, it is proved that wherever the national authority financially supports the students, the country is beneficial from its well-educated manpower. The residents themselves can have better chance to seek high salary jobs and better positions in the society. Since no longer illiterates, more intellectual workers are able to adapt the fast-paced life. However, there are some certain fields which the manual labors have to be the main contributor. For example, the pottery and craft industries needs the artists’ hands to create the masterpieces although it has already developed some machinery.
In conclusion, the people will facilitate a lot from the high tech and free education, which are fully support from the government. In my perspective, the state should limit its budget in terms of education and develops more forms of technology to ease people’s lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29779411765 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98925546721 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621323529412 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7056289232 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.928571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136505438867 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413837689532 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385313881794 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891607498267 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394492637585 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.