It is often argued that the nation’s leader allocated their budgets on arts. In my opinion, I completely agree that they should use their nation’s money to improve on other aspects in the country.
To begin with, spending a lucrative amount of money into art is wasting the country’s resources. This is because art is expensive, and required a lucrative amount of time and resources in order to complete. As a result, tax rate might increase so that the government can continue to fund these type of projects, wasting a lot of time, and decrease the quality of life of their citizens. For instance, in Viet Nam, there is a government official who had spent a huge amount of the government’s budgets, which comprise mostly of tax money, into building a copper statue of Ho Chi Minh, and waste those resources which could use to help other people such as build a school for unfortunate children.
In addition, the government should allocate the money into health care system or public transport. Some countries health care are not helping people as it was intended to because these systems lack the funds so they have to cut corners in order to continue operating, which the nation’s leader could curb these situations by investing money into improving health care system. Thus, improving people’s lives and helping them cure their illnesses. Furthermore, they can also allocating the nation’s resource into improving public transport for citizens. This can help both the habitants and the environment by having a bus that can carry more people and use electricity instead of petroleum for their fuel. To illustrate, Elon Musk, who is the founder of Tesla, had produced an electric cars which only use electricity as their fuel, and in the future the government could invest into these type of transportation and turn it into public transport.
In conclusion, many people believe that the government are wasting the nation’s money into arts. In my view, I think that the nation’s leader should spent those resources into improving the quality of life of their citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...h care system or public transport. Some countries health care are not helping people as i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'allocate'
Suggestion: allocate
...r illnesses. Furthermore, they can also allocating the nation’s resource into improving pu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04335260116 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72690426729 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494219653179 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3827330522 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.642857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209226870158 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809622262571 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553808086751 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136957754591 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562766826696 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.