In the present age, some people think that there should be fixed sentences for each type of crime while others are of the opinion that the situations of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when inflicting the punishment. This essay will examine both sides of the argument and outline my opinion.
On the one hand, there are some good arguments for having one set punishment for each crime. First of all, it would be easy to utilize a standardized punishment on certain crimes. Simultaneously, the awareness of urban dwellers about convicted crime might be increased. For example, in Singapore, if you throw rubbish or smoke in a restricted area, you will have to pay three thousand dollars for a severe fine. For that unchangeable punishment, citizens of Singapore might be aware of illegal actions and that could lead to decrease in crimes.
On the other hand, I would argue that the situations of a crime and the criminal’s motivation should have an influence on the punishment. It is obvious to say that criminals should clarify their initial motives before giving them sentences. For example, a harsh punishment should be given to a murderer; otherwise, those who killed people in the act of self-defense, the verdict they received should be lenient.
In conclusion, there are some advantages of fixed punishments. Nevertheless, I maintain my original position that each of various crimes should be given appropriate punishments only based on their situations and impulse. By that, the ones who deserve a second chance would receive a deserving sentence.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15849056604 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89843748186 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5898973411 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.153846154 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.523014173553 0.244688304435 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157791488589 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161298123263 0.0667982634062 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313608943828 0.151304729494 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13961692583 0.056905535591 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.