Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is argued that time and money are spent so significantly on conservation of endangered species tha it is better to divert those resources to projects designed regarding long-term benefits on human beings. This essay disagrees this statement for the reasons provided below.
The preservation of wild animals and other species is actually inadequate, let alone excessive. That is because a large number of animals are still being endangered and many of which are on the verge of extinction despite abundant conservation projects launched in numerous places in the world. Evidently, in spite of great effort made by transnational non-profit organizations, scientists and zoologists, the cases of poaching tigers are carried out more often and sophisticated in many ways which has a dramatic decline of 95% over the last 100 years.
Animals have an intimate correlation with human beings and protecting them is synonymous with ameliorating human life. Evidently, wild animals play a vital role in life. In fact, not only do they balance the ecology but they also provide people with food. Therefore, if a single wild species is missing from the ecosystem, it will disrupt the whole food chain, leading to disastrous consequences on human life. For example, coral reefs surviving at the seafloor are crucial factors owing to the fact that it helps to deter extreme climatic phenomena from jeopardizing fishes, which ensures the marine growth. As a result, if this species disappear, the provision of food for export and other domains will no longer exist.
In conclusion, although there has been a certain deal of endeavor in preserving animals, it is still imperative for people to spend more time and money studying the ways to protect them for the better life prospect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e, let alone excessive. That is because a large number of animals are still being endangered and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more time and money studying the ways to protect them for the better life prospec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20979020979 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84355820543 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7114857571 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233196299343 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774982938396 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554987443687 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132037966495 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06422858234 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.