Human society develops with a heavy cost on the animal worlds. A vast majority of different species are being pushed to the verge of extinction, so Governments along with ordinary people should join in an effort to protect wild. There are some debates over whether money that is spent on wildlife protection could be better spent on helping people. Personally, I hold a stern belief that Investing more money is more deserved as well as it is obligation with individuals in preserving their animal species.
Firstly, I do not believe that much time or money is actually allocated into protecting wild animals. A large majority of time that people spent on such issues is voluntary work that people do because they are passionate about saving and helping animals. Additionally, A large amount of money that is spent on these causes is from charity organisations which rely mostly in donations. Therefore, we cannot tell people what charities that they should or should not donate their time and money towards.
Secondly, while many people believe convey that humans are the superior race on the planet. But it is no means that They can implement whatever they want without any permissions. All living beings, animals, and human have equal rights to live in peace, and hence, the protection of animal species and their shelter is extremely imperative. As a confession of each individuals, Human activity is no doubt the primary contributor to the main cause of most disasters wild animals face. The race of human leads to the severe downcoming of biodiversity, go on destroy the planet and the natural habitats of these species. Therefore should be responsible for keep them in a well-preserved status so as to maintain an unlimited diversity of ecosystems.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is essential for the health of the plant to remain a variety of animals and wildlife within many next decades. I also believe that due to rampant hunting or the widespread devastation humans have caused to the natural environment. It is our responsibility to do whatever necessary, regardless of money and time sacrification, in order to restore a healthy balance to the planet's natural environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'debates'' or 'debate's'?
Suggestion: debates'; debate's
... effort to protect wild. There are some debates over whether money that is spent on wil...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aving and helping animals. Additionally, A large amount of money that is spent on...
^^
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... the natural habitats of these species. Therefore should be responsible for keep them in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...or keep them in a well-preserved status so as to maintain an unlimited diversity of ecos...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06060606061 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87254255536 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553719008264 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3736223265 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.058823529 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303901751896 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882328491939 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715048140179 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175414668351 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962240622348 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.