Wild animals play vital roles in purveying the nutritional sustenance to nourish and nurture to both mental and physical way of people as well as supporting experiments to help researchers find new treatments to cure diseases, as a result, people inclined to think that governments should expend money and time on protecting the survival of wild animals, in opposition,argued that this money should be used for the problems of humankind. Personally, I believe that people should maintain a balance between the amount of money allocated for humans and other species.
On the one hand, money and endeavours should be spent on the welfare of the populace. The main reason for this view is that there are still manifold afflictions which need to be alleviated in the society nowadays. For example, some developing countries in Africa are facing the starvation and poverty that lead to the demise of the children and the elderly as well as inherent terrorists threaten to freedom and peace of those individuals. Because of this, state subsidies should be spent on helping people to overcome these situations and improve their livelihoods rather than on preserving wild animals. Another reason for this opinion is that many insects have detrimental impacts on the quality and quantity of agricultural products. Grasshoppers, for instance, eat crops and wreak havoc on the fields on many farms, which reduce the productivity of these products and farmers'livelihood. In my perspective, expending money to protect wild animals is partially unnecessary.
On the other hand, wild animals also help people in many aspects. Firstly, the protection of those species will benefit people in the medical field, to be specific, thanks to researching and undergoing the experiments on the part of mice or rats that people could find new vaccines or drugs to resist diseases and cure many patients. Secondly, I'm firmly convinced that the protection of wild animals which ensures the natural balance of all life on Earth. It is conceivable that if animals vanish completely, the natural habitats will be affected considerably such the destruction of forests, infertility of soil and poor condition of biodiversity so that the survival of humankind could be threatened significantly. Finally, the expenditure on resolving the consequences when these animals die out would far outweigh the costs of preservation. In my opinion, it is crucial for people to protect the survival of wild animals.
In conclusion, it seems to me that people should contemplate carefully the quantity of money invested for humans and wild animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , argued
... survival of wild animals, in opposition,argued that this money should be used for the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...eases and cure many patients. Secondly, Im firmly convinced that the protection of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27951807229 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02473472838 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525301204819 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.1262720401 49.4020404114 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.9375 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9375 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293607306786 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977076934563 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066261949125 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185785390448 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365871792321 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.