Some people think that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, and the government and big companies can make a difference. To what extent you agree or disagree?
It is argued that only the government and big companies can improve the environment and individuals make no contributions. I disagree with this idea.
One of the main reasons why individuals can improve the environment is that individuals can reduce the amount of rubbish. Nowadays, a large amount of daily garbage is carelessly produced by citizens themselves, and if they can be aware of that, the output of daily waste will be largely decreased. For example, the white pollution, one the most serious problems in the world, is generated by those who prefer to apply plastic bags to pack their goods when they go shopping and do not realize that their bad habit may be the major reason for this pollution.
Another is that individuals can conserve natural resources. A large quantities of resources are being wasted due to residents’ inappropriate use and once the public use them reasonably, the energy crisis that humans are facing will be eased. A good case in point is that a large amount of electricity will be saved when people appropriately use their domestic appliances, such as turning off the TV when they do not want to watch.
Admittedly, a few people may think that only the government and big companies can make a contribution to protect the environment. The main reason is that governments are more powerful and can draw up and enact harsh laws to punish those who damage the environment, such as the companies which has generated massive pollution due to the outdated machines. Besides, big companies can set a good example for other companies through advancing their production devices and the rest firms will follow in their footsteps.
To summarize, there is no doubt that government and big companies can largely improve the environment. However, I still believe that everyone, including individuals, can make contributions to environmental protection.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'quantity'?
Suggestion: quantity
...can conserve natural resources. A large quantities of resources are being wasted due to re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, for example, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12337662338 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0029501433 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542207792208 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5984323169 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.384615385 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338686536556 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149941222819 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118663727779 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223557810826 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105787296026 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.